Killed By Who? How Western Media Hides Israeli War Crimes, Pt.1

I start every morning by swiping news alerts of the latest war crimes that Israel has committed. Schools, hospitals, vaccination centres, refugee camps, volunteer and aid workers, United Nations staffersnothing is off limits for Zionist Israel. Killings of innocent children are swiped away just like that, in an ever-growing archive of reports that will never see justice in our “rules-based world”, because they were of the wrong colour and race.

But there’s another thing I notice in these dreadful headlines from the Western Media, a sharply implied ambiguity. The perverse idea that it is unclear who is committing these Crimes Against Humanity. Western headlines provide only half the context (e.g., a child has been killed, a school has been bombed, aid efforts are stopped), but that’s where they abruptly end. They never mention the criminal. This mini-study covers this Western Media agenda to protect Israel.

But why would Western Media do such a thing? Because it goes against Zionist interests. I’ve already published reports on how Zionists used Western media to downplay Zionist terror attacks on the West, to hide Israeli massacres, and to hide Israeli rape camps. Recent polls show majority of Americans support continued military aid to Israel, and that the majority view Hamas as a terror group.

Simply put – they don’t want Westerners to know the truth of Israel’s genocide and famine. At least not until it is too late. So without further ado, let’s begin.

Who bombed these kids?!

Let’s start with the popular, very recent Israeli aggression in the West Bank. I’m not going to write commentary for every article, but I will comment in the captions.

Reuters misleading title on Israeli murder of a child in West Bank
What could possibly have killed a Palestinian girl in the West Bank for looking out the window? Could it have been a Hamas terrorist? No way this could imply *gasp* an Israeli soldier to be the killer? Credit: Reuters
BBC misleading tweet on IDF murder of an American citizen.
When an American was shot by Israeli soldiers, the BBC’s tweet conveniently left out Israel’s crime, reaching at least 4.1M impressions. West Bank? Surely that means ‘Hamas’ must have killed an American.
NYT justifiying killing of Gazans.
NYT special report disclaims that Israel took ‘care’ to prevent mass-killing of civilians. The headline sells the war crime off as ‘almost inevitable’ as if killing citizens is OK. Doesn’t even mention it was an Israeli airstrike, just a ‘strike’. Inevitable is a powerful word to play with. Credit: New York Times
NYT not willing to defame Israel in forcing Gazans to evacuate.
Who is giving the evacuation orders? Could it be ‘Hamas’ or ‘Islamic Terrorists’ forcing the tired Gazans to leave? Surely there was real-estate in that headline to mention Israel. Credit: New York Times.
A headline from NYT
Such a bizarre event – What strike? An airstrike? Done by who? Could it be the Hamas Air Force? The role of Israel’s armed forces is conveniently concealed for someone who skims the headlines. A strike could even mean an IED, and you know ‘terrorists’ love those.

Do you notice a trend with these too-convenient headlines? So far, not a single headline has contained ‘Israel’, despite being the aggressor. Let’s explore some more.

NYT proving it is a Zionist paper that does not provide a honest headline to events.
Despite writing that aid efforts have worsened because of Israel’s Rafah invasion (that U.S. President Joe Biden lied about), NYT tentatively blames ‘Anarchy’? What does that even mean? Israel is still not mentioned. Credit: New York Times
Timeline of Reuters changing headlines to protect Israel.
Reuters made a mistake of blaming Israel for hitting a school, so the headline was edited twice in panic until it soothed the blame against Israel. Credit: u/hunegypt

If this does not demonstrate a Western conspiracy to protect Israel from blame in bombing schools, then I don’t know what will. It only takes me four taps on the keyboard to write ‘100+’, but I can assure you seeing 100+ bloodied, blown corpses will make your heart recoil. A hundred civilians are passed on as ‘militants’ as if their lives were so worthless, simply because Israel said so. And also, it is no longer even a school. Let’s explore even further.

A double mislead. The headline fails to mention the origin of decomposing babies (Israel) and shooting of a journalist (Israel). The journalist could have been shot in a local brawl or whatnot? Credit: Washington Post
Oh no, an ‘attack‘ on a former school? I wonder who carried out that attack. Surely, it couldn’t have been the Israeli Army? Credit: New York Times
An airstrike in a densely populated block creates a massacre, but NYT is unsure of where the airstrike came from. Israel isn’t mentioned yet again, despite the long-running history of Israeli airstrikes on civilian homes and blocks. Credit: NYT
BBC doesn't blame Israel in the headline for killing of Hind Rajab
BBC mentions that a Gazan girl was found dead, but doesn’t explain why it happened. Surely Israel had nothing to do with her murder. Going by this headline, Hind Rajab simply dropped dead, just like that. Credit: BBC
CNN hiding Israeli murder.
Military Fatigues? Really? Western Media refuses to even see Israeli military uniforms. What exactly was the intention here? Later the CNN headline was revised to say ‘Israeli soldier’. Credit: CNN
This shameless piece from NYT hails Israel’s war crimes in Gaza as ‘extremely effective’ in curbing Hamas, but opines that Israel is losing favour from allies. An utter lack of human empathy is demonstrated, as the author recognises saving face from Western allies more important than the killing of over 20,000 children in Gaza. Credit: NYT

Takeaway

12 Headlines, only 1 mentions ‘Israel’ after panic-struck redactions. The Western Media very much has a pro-Israel ‘standard’ to uphold, and it is only possible when its reporting is twisted to make sure Israeli atrocities are concealed. Most people reading the news skim through the headlines, and in this way, the Westerners have a far lower chance of learning of Israel’s War Crimes.

Zionist “Think Tanks” like Henry Jackson Society fund ‘studies‘ that blame British Muslims of supporting Hamas despite it being a UK-designated terror group. Conveniently, the Zionists want Westerners to forget that Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party draws origin from UK-designated terror group, Irgun, as confirmed by the CIA.

The media conspiracy of reporting only the half-truth on Israel’s terrorism is nothing new, even in 1937 the pro-Zionist newspaper, the Palestine Post, gave this headline after Zionist terrorists (Irgun) killed 10+ Arabs on the infamous ‘Black Sunday’.

Newspaper article on a Zionist attack on Arabs in Palestine, 16 Nov 1937
When attacking Jews were arrested, the language described for their arrest was dubious at best, despite their alleged atrocities. Arrested under the ‘regulations’, not terrorism? no murder? What? November 16, 1937 issue of the Palestine Post (XIII no. 3497)

If you like this report, you may also like my earlier foray into exploring Western media hypocrisy in reporting rapes, a comparison on Ukraine and Gaza. Coming as no surprise, we concluded that Western media does not cover Israeli rapes of Palestinians, but is unsurprisingly proactive in reporting Russian rapes. If history is your thing, read my series on Zionist terror attacks in Palestine starting from 1937.

This report will be followed by a second part, follow me on Twitter to get notified on when that happens.

I’m also excited to be publishing my first novel soon, a literary adventure on poverty and slums. A setting rarely seen in the modern literature, where we throw a snobby millionaire into a South Asian slum, a brutal world that preys on its weakest; women and children.

I’m an author & journalist from Islamabad, Pakistan. I explore authentic, credible stories of colonialism and modern-day Imperialism from the West. I also write stories of marginalised, unheard voices that live in slums and indigence. Voices that are rarely heard in the modern literature.

My blog is reader-funded and always free to access. If you enjoy my journalism and would like to fund my work (any amount is welcome), I’d greatly appreciate it. To stay updated with my latest publications, consider subscribing for free to get my blogs to your inbox. You can also follow me on Twitter / X.